Arqis is risk intelligence and compliance for offtake contracts: underwriting the transaction before you sign it, re-underwriting the ones you already signed, and re-rating both as credit, delivery, power and regulation move.
| Contract | Counterparty | Value | Exposure | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU supply deal | Neocloud, US | $500.0m | $12.4m | Just added |
| Compute lease | Data centre op., SA | $84.0m | $8.1m | Monitored |
| Colocation MSA | Cloud operator, UAE | $61.2m | $2.3m | Monitored |
| Transformer supply | OEM, delivery slipped | $14.5m | $8.4m | Re-rated |
Risk gets assessed once, in pieces, by people who never see each other's work. Then the deal is signed and monitoring falls back to spreadsheets and calendar reminders.
One platform, one risk methodology, one audit trail. Only the entry point changes: most customers start with the contracts they are most worried about, then extend to the rest of the book.
In origination, structuring or approval. Not yet committed.
Signed under time pressure, inherited, or never diligenced to this standard.
Credit, ownership, sanctions, power, delivery, hardware or regulation moves.
A transformer OEM confirms the unit has slipped from 128 weeks to 144. Four contracts in an illustrative book sit downstream of that date.
| Contract | Counterparty | Value | Exposure | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU supply deal | Neocloud, US | $500.0m | $12.4m | Monitored |
| Compute lease | Data centre op., SA | $84.0m | $8.1m | Monitored |
| Colocation MSA | Cloud operator, UAE | $61.2m | $2.3m | Monitored |
| Transformer supply | OEM, Korea | $14.5m | $1.2m | Monitored |
Eight risks sit inside every transaction. Counterparty, contract and regulatory dependency are covered today, on one graph, with the other five built on the same record so nothing is re-entered as they arrive.
You build 300MW and demand does not arrive, or the tenant weakens before it does.
A tenant, supplier or JV partner deteriorates or becomes restricted.
A ten-year agreement has no answer for changed circumstances.
Export controls, sanctions or AI rules move under the deal after you sign it.
Transformer, GPU, switchgear or cooling delivery slips past the date the contract assumes.
The assumptions holding up the debt stop being true.
The insurer cannot price what it cannot see.
The same tenant, GPU or grid sits under many assets at once.
The eight risks are the same everywhere. What differs is which one breaks your book first, and that is where each brief starts.
Duration mismatch between long GPU and power commitments and much shorter customer contracts, priced in dollars and GPU-hours.
Tenant credit, grid access, EPC delivery and regulation, read as one graph instead of five disconnected systems.
Allocation commitments, lead-time risk and warranty exposure on the orders that sit upstream of every AI infrastructure deal.
Borrowing-base tests, covenant resets and residual-value risk on GPU, data-centre and compute-offtake financing.
Counterparty, delivery and regulatory risk on cross-border AI infrastructure capital, kept current for the life of the hold, not just at close.
Structured exposure and evidence an underwriter accepts, with accumulation across tenants, OEMs and grids made visible before it is written.
The buy-side view: screen the supplier, price the commitment and structure the agreement before you commit capital to it.
Whose budget it comes from, what it displaces, and what we need from you to prove it on your own book in the first thirty days.
Run Arqis alongside your current process: one new transaction, one signed contract set, or your live portfolio under monitoring. You baseline it, we run it, and you compare. The fee is at risk against a number you set on day one.